So bad it’s…bad

Some of the Indigenous folks I follow on Mastodon were very displeased regarding some joke about smallpox blankets or something similar. Was kinda’ glad I didn’t go. Though the real reason is an automatic rejection of toy commercials stretched out to film length. I guess I’d watch if it was pirated, though. That’s how I feel about Polanski, too. :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

I’m aware of that and am extremely tolerant. I watch plenty of things I don’t see eye to eye on. I went to Barbie (2023) fully aware I probably wouldn’t like it yet hoping to be surprised. I remain hopeful and still do. The thing is when something isn’t for a particular audience there used to be an attempt to transcend that intent to somewhat appeal to everyone. I didn’t feel that here. It was so all in and if you aren’t already all in it leaves you behind. And on top of that I felt spoken down to and the movie operated on modern comedy dimensions I have increasingly disliked since There’s Something About Mary (1998). It wasn’t my movie but further it wasn’t a lot of people’s movie. Not that it has to be but popular entertainment used to be for everyone not select audiences. Its success proves it found fans and more power to it. I simply am not one of them.

The LEGO Movie really paved the way for the self-aware deconstructionist toy movie genre. Barbie is a part of that and I for one love that such a genre even exists. I liked the LEGO Movie quite a bit more than Barbie but I did like them both. Granted, being a male with no sisters growing up it’s easy to see why I might relate more to one vs. the other but I’m happy that either movie can exist A) with a personality, B) with a genuine sense of humor, and C) without feeling like the whole endeavor is a giant commercial for toys (even if it kinda is, it still feels less like a giant commercial than Mac & Me did).

2 Likes

It was also nice to have a movie about girls and women and empowerment and patriarchy at a level that wasn’t too intellectual for my daughter to understand and put in a package she would pay attention to.

3 Likes

It’s a case of quality not theme. Female empowerment and men? So many films did it far more effectively. Roman Holiday (1953), La Strada (1954), It Happened One Night (1934), Gone with the Wind (1939), The Silence of the Lambs (1991) [Hello Patriarchy!!!], Terms of Endearment (1983), Alien (1979), Aliens (1986), The Terminator (1984), Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991), The Post (2017) [Many of the same themes and not as obvious], Julia (1977) [Ditto with great performances], The Accused (1988) [Ditto], Copycat (1995), Blood Simple (1984), Fargo (1996), Titanic (1997), The Hours (2002), Black Widow (2021) [Nearly identical, better movie], The Bridges of Madison County (1995), Jackie Brown (1997), Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore (1974), The Exorcist (1973) [Ellen owns the movie], Rear Window (1954) [She reads what she wants in that final shot and the song is hers], Million Dollar Baby (2004), Changeling (2008), Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1967) [Strong women who stand up to Tracy], The Sound of Music (1965) [Maria is empowered by staying herself], Driving Miss Daisy (1989) [Opinated muscular matriarch], To Catch a Thief (1955), Network (1976) [Faye Dunaway and Beatrice Straight!!!], Oppenheimer (2023) [Emily Blunt is on fire], As Good As It Gets (1997) [Helen Hunt putting men in their place], Kill Bill Vol. 1 (2003) [Women are the dominant force], Kill Bill Vol. 2 (2004) [The Same], Panic Room (2002), Hannibal.(2001), The Piano (1993), Skyfall (2012) [M Surrounded By Men], The Martian (2015) [Jessica Chastain, Kirsten Wiig, Kate Mara, Mackenzie Davis], Zero Dark Thirty (2012), Molly’s Game (2017), The Contender (2000) [Joan Allen holding toe to toe with heavyweights], The Bourne Supremacy (2004) [Allen steals the movie], Captain Marvel (2019 [Larson, Bening, Empowerment Everywhere], Wonder Woman (2017), Avatar (2009), Starship Troopers (1997) [Many strong women], Casino (1995), Johnny Guitar (1954), Dolores Claiborne (1995) [Women are the most interesting characters], The Intern (2015) [A textbook of role inversion, Anne Hathaway dominates], Interstellar (2014) [Hathaway and Chastain save humanity], Halloween (1978) [Jamie Lee Curtis stands up to evil], The Abyss (1989) [Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio rules the roost], Twister (1996) [Hunt is the driving force].

I LOVE all these films. They have great messages. Women take center stage in many of them. And the storytelling is strong and no one feels like a stereotype. My issue is depth, vibrancy of elements, and balance of storytelling. I watch films repeatedly and those that last are the ones that have you at hello. And keep you there. When you lose yourself to the story those I find infinitely better than the ones always telling you about it.

Anyway thank you for being a great dad and caring about your daughter enough to want her to have that message. I guess for me (and your mileage always varies) I found others better at the attempt and better movies as well. We all like what we like. Thanks.

1 Like

None of the movies you listed have conversations about patriarchy. Some of the ones you listed also baffle me. Gone With the Wind shows Scarlett happily smiling the morning after Rhett carries her upstairs while she screams for him to stop. There is nothing empowering about that and it’s a terrible lesson to teach.

3 Likes

Scarlett is too much woman for Rhett and he leaves because he can’t handle her. Scarlett is a force of nature and too strong for her husband. She is the ultimate survivor and survives him. The topic of Patriarchy is lived and visualized in every one of those films in various forms. Either in effect, representation, or plot. It’s there without overtly dominating the narrative with it. If you want that? Go with Barbie (2023). I watch film for stories, absorption, and diversion. When a topic so covers a film, is it storytelling any more? We each have that perspective and that’s what we bring to it. I’m appreciative for your time and thoughts. Sorry for going on.

P.S. Movies from the past may distract us with many things. My thought was on the character of Scarlett not the era she inhabited.

I’m sorry, but you’re calling a movie where a woman submits to sexual assault and enjoys it empowering for women, which suggests to me that you don’t really understand what is empowering.

I sure as hell wouldn’t want my daughter to think “if I lay back and enjoy it when my husband forces me to have sex with him, I’ll be resilient.”

2 Likes

I was thinking of the final scene and how the film ends with her free and in control. Staring out at Tara and her surroundings. I don’t condone or approve of the scene you mention. Life is “brutish, ugly, and short” and people are complicated accepting things they shouldn’t, not knowing better, or being told to not care by society at the time. None of that is cool. Nor is it acceptable. But it does happen. Unfortunately. I always thoughts the arts were supposed to convey uncomfortable realities and provide a snapshot of our hopeful progression through the heart of darkness of the human soul. Some of these stories are stamped by time and should only be viewed with adult eyes. As a survivor of abuse myself, I sleep at night by carrying on and becoming the best me I can. I hate victimization with a red hot passion. If art can help us carry on, learn, and be better despite their imperfections and mistakes I take note of it. I’ve said enough. Props to you on the conversation.

Providing such uncomfortable realities is fine for an adult. But girls are not women and girls need these lessons too. And put in a language that isn’t too adult and isn’t too scary for them. Which is why movies like this are a benefit for children.

1 Like

Fair enough. I can go with that. We need material for the right age. I get that.

1 Like

Lastly many of the films I mention but not all should be seen by adult audiences. Sorry for not saying that upfront. I tried to think of more G Rated examples and couldn’t think of them.

1 Like

5 Likes

Cheap, Lousy Dirty Movies Less Than An Hour Long Double Feature:

Alice in Acidland (1969)

Narrated throughout, with no recorded dialogue at all, by a stern-voiced man and Alice herself. She goes from innocent to smoking, drinking, using marihuana, and cavorting with both men and women. Forty-five minutes of black-and-white nudie stuff, then ten minutes of full color, arty, LSD trip (still with nudie content) that ends with Alice in a strait-jacket.

‘Necromania’: A Tale of Weird Love! (1971)

Ed Wood, under a phony name, wrote and directed. Young couple shows up at a supposedly spooky house (it looks like a plain old house to me) in hopes of helping the man with his problem. Random sex scenes until the woman who is supposed to help (she’s a necromancer, we’re told) appears in a coffin and the man jumps in there with her.

3 Likes

Doctor Dracula (1974/1978/1983)

Schlockmeister Al Adamson took footage from something called Lucifer’s Women (1974), added some new footage in 1978, and got it shown on TV in 1983. I think.

The incoherent plot has something to do with the reincarnation of Svengali being mixed up with Satanists who are planning to sacrifice the reincarnation of Trilby to extend their own lives. Meanwhile, a woman tries to find out the cause of her mother’s death. (In the very opening, we already know she was a victim of a vampire/psychiatrist, our Doctor Dracula.) The conflicted Svengali – he literally splits into two people at one point – tries to save Trilby. John Carradine is around as one of the Satanists. Very talky and dull.

2 Likes

How to Succeed With Girls (1964)

Ultra-cheap, ultra-obscure (there are no reviews on IMDB, and the synopsis found there has nothing to do with the actual film) sex comedy. I’d be hard pressed to tell you what the plot is, as it mostly consists of random scenes, but it has something to do with an aggressive ladies’ man of a poet and a meek fellow. Poet is fooling around with the meek fellow’s wife, but also tries to teach him how to be more assertive with women. These black-and-white “real” segments alternate with the meek fellow’s full color fantasies. The latter are set in a mad scientist’s laboratory, a harem, the Old West, and a diplomatic meeting.

All of these involve a number of scantily clad young women. Locked up in the mad scientist’s lab, where they are covered with body paint matching the color of their bikinis, which has the odd effect of looking like fake nudity. Looking like costume party harem girls and dance hall girls. Representing fictional nations (like French Lorraine [?] or the Union of Socialistic Republics; two of them just represent “Scandinavia” and “Orient.”) The latter start off in evening gowns, but get into a six-way catfight so their dresses get torn off.

It’s very much like a nudie cutie without the actual nudity, but with the camera frequently aimed at parts of the women’s bodies. The typical nudie cutie of the time is actually a lot more innocent than this thing, which has a wink-wink-nudge-nudge attitude.

Not a good film. Future Golden Girls star Rue McClanahan is the poet’s girlfriend or wife (the messy, often bizarre dialogue implies both.)

3 Likes

Game of Death is this for me. Asked my mom to rent it from Blockbuster for me because I wanted to see Bruce fight Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. It was the first Bruce Lee movie I ever saw. :flushed:

I had no idea it (poorly) used stand-ins over most of its runtime. And I remembered hating it, even as a kid. I can’t even make it past the first 20 minutes today. It’s a shame you have to wade through most of this movie to watch some cool Sammo Hung choreography and the unreleased Bruce fight footage.

I’m glad the uncut Bruce Lee “pagoda” footage is now much easier to come by since the 90’s, including a much longer fight scene between him and Abdul-Jabbar. The recent Arrow Video documentary “The Final Game of Death” shows a lot of the raw footage Lee shot for this sequence over a runtime of 3.5 hours(!). It’s pretty awesome and should really get an official US physical release.

When Bruceploitation experts even tend to regard options in that genre above the “official” Game of Death, it means something went really wrong.

I’m glad I saw Enter the Dragon shortly afterward, which was the best palate cleanser possible…it’s an absolute tragedy that we never saw more from Lee. I’m sure his Game of Death would have been a thousand times greater than what Golden Harvest “salvaged” after his passing.

1 Like

It’s Alive is on Turner Classic Movies. I remember the first time I saw this a few years ago on TCM’s annual Creepy Cinema spotlight with Mario Cantone (who’s always a delight and he should be on more often). In addition to the general cheesiness of the film, there’s some… subtext to the film. With all this awful stuff happening on screen, I’m watching, and thinking, “Wait, is this movie trying to say what I think it’s trying to say? Oh, oh God it is.” It’s bad enough to make an awful movie, but it’s an awful movie promoting an, in my opinion, awful “moral”.

1 Like

Which “It’s Alive?” There’s more than a few movies with that title.

1 Like

The 70s one.

1 Like